Debate abounds over whether globalization is good or bad for the individual, the family, the nation, and the world. Exchanges and interconnections are as old as human history itself, as people moved around the globe in search of opportunity and spreading new ideas. Pessimists view increased interdependence as a terribly destructive trend for communities and culture, while optimists envision a diverse and better life for all. The word “globalization” itself describes an endless range of interactions, both deliberate and accidental. Unforeseen consequences can emerge sometimes decades later. Steady cooperation rather than conflict is in order as global integration continues to influence nearly every aspect of modern life.

Globalization Offered Two Ways: à la Carte and Prix Fixe

US players in global market lack cash and become picky about foreign investment
Daniel Gross
March 15, 2006

Lessons in Learning to Live With Giants

Multinational soft-drink companies dominate the developing world, but perhaps not for long
Daniel Altman
March 15, 2006

Managing Globalization: Old Tax Breaks Fade in New World

Multinational firms confront new challenges in shifting tax burdens around the globe
Daniel Altman
May 17, 2006

Why the Globalization Fund is a Bad Idea

Fund creates an insurance policy rather than attacking root problems
Arnaldo Abruzzini
June 3, 2005

New Globalization Battle Threatens Asia

Increasing anxiety about rapid globalization could slow multinationals emerging from the continent
Joergen Oerstroem Moeller
April 26, 2006