Betting on Biofuels

Potential in the biofuel industry depends on three factors: feedstock costs and availability, government regulations, and conversion technology. With feedstock responsible for at least 50 percent of biofuel production costs, the price has a huge impact on the profits a company can make. However, growing demand for feedstock poses consequences: Rising demand for ethanol increases US corn prices; in Indonesia, environmentalists raised alarm about burning forests to make space for palm oil crops. Evolving biofuel policies around the world present the greatest source of uncertainty, with many governments yet to decide about import tariffs, subsidies or distribution. New technology, for converting raw material to a useable biofuel, will reduce production costs, but regional variations in feedstock may result in a wide range of savings. Despite the many risks of an evolving industry, this McKinsey Quarterly report contends that biofuels present great potential for profits. – YaleGlobal

Betting on Biofuels

The industry is still in its infancy but evolving rapidly. Companies that hope to compete must devise their entry strategy now.
William K. Caesar
Thursday, June 7, 2007

Billions of dollars, euros, pounds, and reais are pouring into biofuels. High fuel prices and generous regulatory support have given the industry healthy margins and relatively short investment payback times. Meanwhile, the triumphs of the first movers and dreams of future growth are enticing companies in industries from petroleum and agribusiness to biotechnology, chemicals, engineering, and financial services. And of course, the allure of a greener future has raised the expectations of investors and bystanders who hope that biofuels will help meet the world’s energy needs while lowering greenhouse gas emissions.

Can biofuels deliver? The answer appears contingent on fuel prices as well as three other variables that directly influence the profitability and environmental impact of biofuels: the cost and availability of feedstock, government regulation, and conversion technologies. All are in flux, so an investment today is a bet on how these interrelated factors will evolve. Feedstock costs vary tremendously by region and could change significantly in the years ahead. Governments may alter the industry’s ground rules to match changing priorities in climate change, energy security, and economic development. The energy, cost, and carbon efficiency of various biofuels are already quite different,1 and new conversion technologies could make them even more so—at different rates in different regions. Decisions about where to produce and distribute biofuels could have dramatic implications for the feasibility of the business.

Amid all this uncertainty, why enter now? In many commodity industries, the winners are the latest entrants, at the bottom of the cost curve—wielding the newest, most efficient technologies. But waiting may be a costly strategy in the nascent biofuel industry because land and other essential resources are at a premium.

Biofuel players should consider different ways to mitigate the risks, but every strategy will require trade-offs. Betting on a number of geographies and technologies will make things more complex, for example, but helps balance risk. Vertical integration, though both complex and costly, may be essential in helping to establish this young industry. Companies that want to play should try to get a head start on the difficult task of reducing the seemingly infinite number of options to a feasible set of solutions.

Click here for the original article.

Bill Caesar is a principal in McKinsey’s Atlanta office, Jens Riese is a principal in the Munich office, and Thomas Seitz is a principal in the Houston office. The authors wish to thank Loula Merkel and Vitaly Negulayev for their contributions to this article.

Copyright © 1992-2007 McKinsey & Company