A Bolt From the Blue Sea

Japan is the source of advanced technology for multiple industries. Triple tragedies of an earthquake, tsunami and nuclear accident – with thousands killed, hundreds of thousands displaced and rolling blackouts – immediately revealed many economic interconnections and the vulnerability of the global supply chain, explains Nayan Chanda, YaleGlobal editor, in his regular column for Businessworld. One out of every five microchips is produced in Japan, Chanda explains, and workers on the other side of the globe were quickly idled as manufacturing plants lacked supplies and were forced to shut down production lines. The disaster could change old habits: Japanese consumers may purchase fewer imports, factories may relocate or seek alternate suppliers, and society may welcome greater numbers of immigrants who can help rebuild infrastructure and restore communities. Regardless, Japan’s skilled work force, capable engineering and ongoing innovation will remain vital links for global supply chains. – YaleGlobal

A Bolt From the Blue Sea

Despite the temporary difficulties, Japan will continue to remain attractive for outsourcing
Nayan Chanda
Thursday, March 31, 2011

What do the Boeing 787 Dreamliner, the Caterpillar Tractor and the Apple iPhone have in common? They are all reeling from the aftershocks of the Japanese earthquake. The triple whammy of a magnitude 9.0 earthquake, 10-metre high tsunami waves and a level 5 nuclear threat, has also given a powerful reminder of our tight interconnectedness. Not only do the live images of a tragedy thousands of miles away tug at our heartstrings, the waves from an industrial Japan cascaded through the tightly intertwined world economy. The new evidence of vulnerability of supply chain dependence, however, could accelerate the search for solution to help manage volatility and adapt to new situations (see Volatility In A Flash).

Within hours of the news of destruction and power outages from Japan, managers of major global firms got busy in devising solutions to overcome the disruption of their Japanese supply chains. Boeing had to assess the impact of the production stoppage at Jamco, its Japanese supplier of galleys for the state-of-the-art airplane, already way behind schedule due to supply chain problems. General Motors swiftly decided to shut down its pick-up truck production facility in Louisiana, fearing that workers would sit idle without components arriving from its Japanese subsidiary. Volvo factories in Sweden face closure if the Japanese cannot resume the supply of navigation and air-conditioning components.

 

A fifth of the world’s microchips that run gadgets is produced in Japan. Analysts are worried about Apple’s ability to meet the skyrocketing demand for its iPad2, given that Toshiba produces the flash memory and batteries that power the device. Toshiba has already had to shut down its LCD factory to recalibrate sensitive machines shaken by the earthquake. With Sony closing down operations at five of its six Japan-based factories, companies depending on Sony components may also have to suspend operations once their stocks are depleted. Caterpillar, not as dependent on sophisticated components as Boeing or Apple, seems to have found alternative suppliers. However, given the sheer complexity and scale of aircraft manufacturing, that option may not available to the likes of Boeing.

Japan has always been a net exporter, but in the aftermath of this disaster, its imports may decline even further. Western corporations that traditionally export high-fashion or high-technology products to Japan are looking at sharp declines in sales as dozens of Japanese outlets have been shut down. Companies supplying meat and other fresh foods wonder when Japan, with its crippled electrical grid, would be able to resume the normal power supply required for refrigeration. One area where foreign corporations may win some entry into Japan is in construction. Despite Japan’s vast construction industry, the task of rebuilding the devastated nation is too massive to exclude foreign firms.


Another side of this transformation may see an outward move by Japan. As companies scramble to find alternative sources, Japanese suppliers may be forced to move their operations to low-cost countries in Asia or near their main markets in the US and Europe. Just as the rise of yen following the 1985 Plaza Accord led Japanese companies to move their operations to cheaper locations, the cost of rebuilding in a devastated region with uncertain power supply may provide new spur to relocate factories.

The latest turmoil in the global supply chain has come at a time when the role of the world’s factory, China, is being reviewed. Rapidly rising wages and a government-led effort to reduce the urban-rural income gap have raised the cost of manufacturing in China, prompting some companies to shift production to lower-wage neighbours such as Vietnam, Thailand, Malaysia and Indonesia. The shift away from China has been slow as others lag behind China in quality infrastructure, skilled labour, and tax and other benefits. Japanese innovation and its highly skilled workers will ensure that despite temporary difficulties, Japan will continue to be attractive for outsourcing. Western firms would also feel more comfortable sharing technology with Japanese counterparts than with many Chinese counterparts suspected of stealing patented knowhow.

The latest destruction and losses in Japan will add to the urgency of reorganising the global supply chain, but Japan’s lead in science and engineering and its manufacturing excellence will ensure a central role for it in the global economy.

The author is director of publications at the Yale Center for the Study of Globalization and editor of YaleGlobal Online.

ABP Pvt Ltd Publication Copyright © All rights reserved.