Financial Times: The Fatal Attraction of a No-Deal Brexit

Great Britain’s deadline for arranging a deal with the European Union is March 29 and analysts anticipate disruptions including shortages of certain foods and supplies as well as new tariffs and confusion over regulations. Gideon Rachman describes three groups for the Financial Times: Hardliners relishing the notion of self-reliance regardless of costs, Remainers hoping for chaos that prompts an extension for negotiations and possibly a change of heart, and the European Commission does not want to compromise on basic principles of the single market. “In their refusal to compromise they risk jointly unleashing a dangerous crisis, whose endgame they can neither predict nor control,” he writes, adding he expects the EU and Britain to gradually rebuild ties. Otherwise, “A bitter rift between the EU and the UK would … be geopolitical madness at a time when Europe is under mounting pressure from Russia, China and the Trump administration in Washington.” Compromise is needed with seven months left to complete a Brexit deal. – YaleGlobal

Financial Times: The Fatal Attraction of a No-Deal Brexit

Special interests may support a hard Brexit for political purposes, but bitter rift between Brussels and London would be geopolitical madness
Gideon Rachman
Tuesday, August 28, 2018

Read  the article from the Financial Times about the dangers of a chaotic no-deal Brexit.

Gideon Rachman became chief foreign affairs columnist for the Financial Times in July 2006. He joined the FT after a 15-year career at The Economist, which included spells as a foreign correspondent in Brussels, Washington and Bangkok.

He also edited The Economist’s business and Asia sections. His particular interests include American foreign policy, the European Union and globalization.

Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2018. All rights reserved.