Russia and Poland Seek Restored Relevance in the New Middle East

Russia's role in the Middle East has always been a crucial part of its global strategy. During the Cold War, the Soviets sought allies amongst states that were alienated by the Americans. Now, Russian President Vladimir Putin is seeking to cash in on current economic and political possibilities in the Middle East. Russia is establishing important trade ties with countries like Turkey, as well as finding willing markets for its weapons. It is also seeking to complement or replace the United States as a mediator in Israeli-Palestinian peace negotiations, despite its troubled past relationship with Israel. Though the latter goal is unlikely to materialize, Russia – followed closely by Poland - is carving out an economic and military sphere of influence in Middle-Eastern states. – YaleGlobal

Russia and Poland Seek Restored Relevance in the New Middle East

Jerzy Zdanowski
Tuesday, June 28, 2005

Russia under President Vladimir Putin is returning to the Middle East after a relative absence during the 1990s. What assets does Russia have to offer, and what are its chances for regaining its previous status as a counterbalancing power vis-a-vis American influence?

Russia has changed tremendously since the fall of the Soviet Union, and so has the Middle East. A dozen years ago, Putin's April 2005 visit to Israel would have been unimaginable. The Soviet cold war strategy prompted Moscow to sponsor and arm Israel's enemies in the Arab world, and to assume superpower patronage of the Arab cause in general and the Palestinian cause in particular. In the 1970s and 1980s Moscow was powerful enough to counterbalance American influence in the Middle East by drawing together the so-called "progressive" Arab countries.

With perestroika and glasnost the situation changed dramatically. First signs of the change became evident in 1988 when groups of Soviet Jews left the Soviet Union for Israel. For the new Soviet leadership under Mikhail Gorbachev, the Jews became a bargaining chip vis-a-vis Washington; as a result, nearly 1 million Jews migrated to Israel. Russia itself went through a sequence of internal transformations that reduced the possibility of its playing an active role in the Middle East. In the Oslo process, Moscow was no more than a mute spectator.

Since the beginning of 2001, oil prices have increased sharply and Russia has obtained significant economic relief. It also gained politically after the September 11, 2001 attacks, when the issue of human rights in Chechnya was transformed into an issue of terrorism. Moscow was ready to return to the Middle East. It brought with it a pragmatic approach to foreign policy adopted by Putin, who is committed to converting diplomacy into business and then business into political influence.

Accordingly, Putin sees oil and gas as a lever to regain positions in Iraq. Russia plans to sell short-range air defense missiles to Syria and is participating in the construction of a nuclear reactor in Iran, where it wants to expand business. It also seeks a role in Afghanistan. Moreover, Putin wants to raise Russia's profile as a peace broker in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Even Saudi businessmen are now interested in exploring Russian markets. Russia has become the second-largest trade partner of Turkey, with $15 billion worth of bilateral trade projected for 2005. And, finally, Moscow is interested in selling more military equipment.

Russia launched its comeback in the Middle East by bitterly opposing the American campaign to oust Iraqi President Saddam Hussein, and then questioning the invasion's legality. Events soon proved, however, that Moscow was still a long way from regaining its previous status in the region. Weapons sales in the Middle East have become more sensitive now that an American military presence has been established. The proposed deal to sell missiles to Syria remains contentious for Israel, just as Moscow's stance on Iran's nuclear aspirations is highly controversial for both Jerusalem and Washington. Putin received little more than a polite acknowledgment of the proposal he made in Cairo to convene an international conference to help resolve the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. In Israel, the proposal was simply rebuffed as premature and Putin was urged to abort the proposed sale of armored personnel carriers to the Palestinian Authority. Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon and Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak apparently believe in the primacy of the United States in the peace process.

During the cold war era, Eastern Europe followed Moscow's pro-Arab line. Poland, for example, condemned Israeli aggression in the June 1967 war and severed diplomatic ties with Israel. After the cold war, Poland's withdrawal from the Warsaw Pact opened the road to Washington; it turned out that a desirable detour went via Jerusalem. Thus, Warsaw became one of the transit points for Soviet Jews migrating to Israel, and in February 1990 Poland restored diplomatic relations with the Jewish state. From the point of view of a sovereign country, this meant pursuing a more balanced line in Middle Eastern affairs. But for some Arab countries this constituted a radical shift in Polish priorities that they did not like.

At that time, Polish foreign policy had a solid moral basis. Warsaw condemned Iraq's aggression against Kuwait in 1990 and immediately implemented relevant UN Security Council decisions despite the ensuing heavy economic losses. This position was appreciated by some of the Gulf countries and they established or re-established diplomatic relations with Poland. Gradually, business led to heightened state-to-state relations. Kuwaiti and other Gulf businessmen now visit Warsaw regularly.

Meanwhile, Putin's recent visit to Egypt and Israel marked a reassertion of Russia's historic involvement in the region's affairs. But his message from beneath the pyramids does not seem to have reverberated, thus proving that Moscow is still far from developing the capacity to counterbalance the United States in Middle Eastern affairs.

Jerzy Zdanowski is professor of Middle Eastern studies at the Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, and at Jagiellonian University, Krakow. This commentary first appeared at bitterlemons-international.org, an online newsletter.

Copyright © 2005, The Daily Star