US Standing in the Middle East
Ongoing use of force in the Middle East is weakening the United States. Sociologist Immanuel Wallerstein argues the country’s problems are structural and briefly outlines the history of US conflicts throughout the latter part of the 20th century. The unnecessary US invasion of Iraq in 2003 accelerated the country’s decline: “This was seen by the interventionists as a mode of restoring waning U.S. hegemony in the world-system. Instead, it badly backfired in two ways. The United States for the very first time lost a vote in the U.N. Security Council and Iraqi resistance to U.S. presence was vaster and more persistent than anticipated. In sum, the invasion transformed a slow decline into a precipitate decline.” The US persists with a hegemonic role rather than accept its limits, Wallerstein notes, even as the struggle divides US citizens, “torn between the glories of being the ‘leader’ and the costs of trying to be the leader.” Others plead for the United States to try more force, but the country loses credibility and trust. – YaleGlobal
US Standing in the Middle East
Immanuel Wallerstein: Costly US intervention and quick fixes in the Middle East are polarizing the country and leading to lost credibility and trust
Monday, December 22, 2014
As of 1976, Immanuel Wallerstein served as distinguished professor of sociology at Binghamton University (SUNY) until his retirement in 1999, and as head of the Fernand Braudel Center for the Study of Economies, Historical Systems and Civilizations until 2005. In 2003 he received the Career of Distinguished Scholarship Award from the American Sociological Association.
http://www.binghamton.edu/fbc/commentaries/archive-2014/390en.htm
Copyright by Immanuel Wallerstein, distributed by Agence Global.