US Urged to Adopt Policy Justifying Intervention
The doctrine known as “responsibility to protect,” or R2P, compels nations to act when other nations commit atrocities against their own people. But decisions on intervention represent a struggle between conscience and pragmatism. The US applied R2P to justify support for Libyan rebels in 2011, but has hesitated to do the same for Syrian rebels, explains Mark Landler of the New York Times, adding that in the latter case, “the strategic complexities of the conflict have outweighed any moral imperative to intervene militarily on behalf of Syria’s embattled rebels. Madeleine K. Albright, former US secretary of state, and Richard S. Williamson, a former special envoy to Sudan, in a report urge “embrace” of R2P. R2P methods can include military, diplomatic and economic options, and rather than threaten sovereignty, notes the report as described by Landler, “a multilateral coalition to deal with foreign conflicts actually strengthens the hand of the United States.” Nations must decide, too, whether to work within UN Security Council constraints, or act quickly and alone. – YaleGlobal
US Urged to Adopt Policy Justifying Intervention
Report sponsored by US Holocaust Memorial Museum, US Institute of Peace, the Brookings Institution urges the US to embrace “responsibility to protect” doctrine
Thursday, July 25, 2013
Mark Landler is a White House correspondent for the New York Times.
Read more about the history of R2P.
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/07/24/us/politics/us-urged-to-adopt-policy-justifyin...
© 2013 The New York Times Company