Who Should Lead the Global Economy?

The major economies of the United States, the European Union and China all have potential for global leadership. “The bigger an economy, the greater its systemic importance, and the more leverage its political representatives have in international decision-making,” explain Harold James and Domenico Lombardi, with the Centre for International Governance Innovation. The United States, the eurozone and China are each large enough to lead globally. Of course, there is concern about US deficits and political gridlock; Europe’s lack of a single debt instrument like the US Treasury bill; and China’s “absence of currency convertibility” and “weak financial supervisory framework.” The two writers outline the qualifications and preparation for global economic leadership: systemic importance in commercial, monetary and financial terms; ability to connect and shape economies; financial markets that offer liquidity and safety; and a legal system with regulations that offer justice and some certainty for companies and investors around the globe. - YaleGlobal

Who Should Lead the Global Economy?

The US, the EU and China have large economies, but leadership requires safe financial system, strong legal system and ability to connect economies
Harold James, Domenico Lombardi
Tuesday, December 24, 2013

Harold James, a senior fellow at the Centre for International Governance Innovation, is professor of history and international affairs at Princeton University and Professor of History at the European University Institute, Florence. Domenico Lombardi is director of the Global Economy Program at the Centre for International Governance Innovation (CIGI) in Canada.

(c) 1995-2013 Project Syndicate