Why Aren’t the Gulf States Taking More Syrian Refugees?

Alarm over the Syrian refugee crisis prompts questions about why Saudi Arabia, Qatar and other wealthy Gulf states that share cultural characteristics do not do more to assist. Amnesty International reports that 3.8 million of the Syrian refugees live in Turkey, Lebanon, Jordan, Iraq and Egypt. Analysts, criticizing Saudi funding the export of radical programs like Wahhabism, suggest that the Gulf governments survive and even prosper by limiting speech and new ideas: “Such prosperity comes from a cautious internal security policy, one that actually places key emphasis on who is allowed in and out of the country,” writes Marc Owen Jones for the New Statesman. He adds that such methods of governance are not sustainable: “In the Gulf Countries, the majority of the population of foreign, but get no privileges, while the small minority get a hugely disproportionate amount.” Thousands of refugees would influence the small countries. The crisis, Jones concludes, exposes the weakness of Gulf States in that they cannot withstand the threat of the most desperate of outsiders and their ideas. – YaleGlobal

Why Aren’t the Gulf States Taking More Syrian Refugees?

The five Gulf countries, the majority of which have significant wealth, have taken zero refugees – the threat of any outsiders is too great for fragile governments
Marc Owen Jones
Friday, September 11, 2015

Marc Owen Jones is co-editor, with Ala’a Shehabi, of “Bahrain’s Uprising: Resistance and Repression in the Gulf”, published this month by Zed Books.

© New Statesman 1913 - 2015