Debate abounds over whether globalization is good or bad for the individual, the family, the nation, and the world. Exchanges and interconnections are as old as human history itself, as people moved around the globe in search of opportunity and spreading new ideas. Pessimists view increased interdependence as a terribly destructive trend for communities and culture, while optimists envision a diverse and better life for all. The word “globalization” itself describes an endless range of interactions, both deliberate and accidental. Unforeseen consequences can emerge sometimes decades later. Steady cooperation rather than conflict is in order as global integration continues to influence nearly every aspect of modern life.

Putin’s Anti-Globalization Strategy

Russia’s president relies on global capital markets, but evades globalization’s western political influence
George Schöpflin
July 11, 2006

Megaplayers Vs. Micropowers

In commerce, finance and politics, global instability empowers the smallest players with resources at their disposal
Moisés Naím
July 12, 2006

Why Globalization Isn’t a Win-Win Situation

Imbalances in China-US trade reflect policy problems from both nations
Stephen Roach
July 12, 2006

The Death of Doha Signals the Demise of Globalization

The Doha deadlock foreshadows the end of globalization as we know it
Martin Jacques
July 13, 2006

World Puts the Brakes on the Rush to Globalization

Collapse of latest session of Doha trade talks heralds a backlash towards globalization
Steven Pearlstein
July 7, 2006