As governments confront many challenges that are global in scale, leaders find they must cooperate in responding to financial, climate, terrorism and other crises. As a result, a global audience has developed keen interest in how and why nations select their leaders. On one hand, citizens expect sensible and collective action, transparency and fair representation; on the other hand, citizens and leaders fret about compromising security, sovereignty or loss of control. Diplomats and global organizations like the United Nations aim to achieve a balance, even as global communications allow citizens in democracies or authoritarian states to steer attention to issues. Attention to citizen demands and multilateral cooperation contribute to stability.

Growing Divide in Saudi Arabia Between Rulers, Ruled

Crackdown on criticism triggers resistance
Karen Elliott House
March 15, 2013

The Kafkaesque Reality of Pakistan's Blasphemy Laws

In Pakistan, blasphemy is in the eye of the beholder
Samira Shackle
March 13, 2013

The Financial Crash Will Not Bring About “Globalization on Steroids”

Global recession triggers international tensions, not cooperation
Joshua Kurlantzick
March 11, 2013

Kim Blows Up Again

Tensions run high; new leaders add to risks of miscalculations near the Korean Peninsula
March 8, 2013

CIA Shifts Hollywood Gaze to Its Best Side

Film audiences overlook torture, drones, civilian deaths
Richard McGregor
February 26, 2013