As governments confront many challenges that are global in scale, leaders find they must cooperate in responding to financial, climate, terrorism and other crises. As a result, a global audience has developed keen interest in how and why nations select their leaders. On one hand, citizens expect sensible and collective action, transparency and fair representation; on the other hand, citizens and leaders fret about compromising security, sovereignty or loss of control. Diplomats and global organizations like the United Nations aim to achieve a balance, even as global communications allow citizens in democracies or authoritarian states to steer attention to issues. Attention to citizen demands and multilateral cooperation contribute to stability.

Japan's Shake-Up Unearths Lessons

Japan’s earthquake-tsunami preparedness reduced the devastation
David Rothkopf
March 14, 2011

Painful Price of Forging a Democratic Era

The struggle for political reform turns deadly in Libya
Roula Khalaf
March 11, 2011

America Should Not Prosecute Julian Assange

US pursuit of the WikiLeaks founder discourages the freedom to connect
Joseph Nye
March 9, 2011

Political Doubt Hits Zimbabwe Investors

Companies based in nations that dare criticize Zimbabwe’s leadership face takeovers
Farai Mutsaka, Peter Wonacott
March 7, 2011

Significance of Wisconsin Union Battle

The internet highlights US labor battle, attracting global sympathy and pizza orders
Ellen Ratner
March 3, 2011