As governments confront many challenges that are global in scale, leaders find they must cooperate in responding to financial, climate, terrorism and other crises. As a result, a global audience has developed keen interest in how and why nations select their leaders. On one hand, citizens expect sensible and collective action, transparency and fair representation; on the other hand, citizens and leaders fret about compromising security, sovereignty or loss of control. Diplomats and global organizations like the United Nations aim to achieve a balance, even as global communications allow citizens in democracies or authoritarian states to steer attention to issues. Attention to citizen demands and multilateral cooperation contribute to stability.

Future of Two Unions, the EU and the UK, Hangs in Balance

The UK may set conditions for EU on immigration – or go its own way, losing global influence
Alistair Burnett
May 12, 2015

Xi Jinping’s High-Risk Policy Needs a National Security Commission

China’s president has dominant role in foreign policy, but coordination on decision-making could be lacking
David M. Lampton
May 5, 2015

Vietnam and US Find Strategic Common Ground

Vietnam tries to balance ties between Washington and Beijing – and avoid conflict in the South China Sea
Murray Hiebert
April 30, 2015

Will the Real Iran Please Stand Up?

Iranians are eager to end sanctions, but a divided bureaucracy could block deal to curb the nuclear program
Robert A. Manning
April 28, 2015

Rebalancing the Middle East

US Middle East policies should strive to balance power between Saudi Arabia and Iran
Emma Sky
April 23, 2015

European Union Divided Over Greek Bailout

Stalemate on Greece: Fearing voters’ wrath, European leaders lack courage for a deal on austerity and bailouts
Chris Miller
April 16, 2015