As governments confront many challenges that are global in scale, leaders find they must cooperate in responding to financial, climate, terrorism and other crises. As a result, a global audience has developed keen interest in how and why nations select their leaders. On one hand, citizens expect sensible and collective action, transparency and fair representation; on the other hand, citizens and leaders fret about compromising security, sovereignty or loss of control. Diplomats and global organizations like the United Nations aim to achieve a balance, even as global communications allow citizens in democracies or authoritarian states to steer attention to issues. Attention to citizen demands and multilateral cooperation contribute to stability.

Vietnam’s Economy Needs Reoriented Foreign Policy

Vietnam’s leaders try to hedge with China, but dissidents call it kowtowing
David Brown
February 20, 2013

An Interview with John Dramani Mahama

One advantage Ghana has in all this is that we have a free society
John Dramani Mahama
February 18, 2013

Is the US Ready To Be Number Two?

US leaders dare not admit it, but China’s poised to become the largest economy
Kishore Mahbubani
February 11, 2013

Under China’s Shadow, India Looks to Australia

India and Australia strategize on trade, energy and naval security
Ashok Malik
February 8, 2013

The US Focuses on Its Homefront

Americans worry about terrorist threat, but want President Obama to tackle economy first
Bruce Stokes
February 6, 2013

Nations Can Try Promotion – Not Protectionism

Selective engagement with the global economy, prioritizing growth, spurs inequality
Anthony P. D’Costa
February 4, 2013