As governments confront many challenges that are global in scale, leaders find they must cooperate in responding to financial, climate, terrorism and other crises. As a result, a global audience has developed keen interest in how and why nations select their leaders. On one hand, citizens expect sensible and collective action, transparency and fair representation; on the other hand, citizens and leaders fret about compromising security, sovereignty or loss of control. Diplomats and global organizations like the United Nations aim to achieve a balance, even as global communications allow citizens in democracies or authoritarian states to steer attention to issues. Attention to citizen demands and multilateral cooperation contribute to stability.

In Disputes Over Asian Seas, Winner May Take Zilch

Territorial disputes in the South and East China seas could derail the Asian Century
Robert A. Manning
January 14, 2013

Two Diverging Roads for Afghanistan

China and India invest billions in Afghan infrastructure, good reason to promote security
Thomas Barfield
January 11, 2013

Island Nations Play China, India

China’s new ties with Maldives, Seychelles, Sri Lanka sink India’s influence over Indian Ocean
Harsh V. Pant
January 9, 2013

Put Doomsday on the Schedule

Alternately imposing, ignoring debt ceilings and automatic cuts, Congress adds to global uncertainty
David Dapice
January 7, 2013

Nationalism Rises in Northeast Asia

Territorial fights menace prosperity in Japan, China, South Korea and global interdependence
Jean-Pierre Lehmann
January 4, 2013

Recipe for a Post-Hegemonic USA

Self-defeating antics of US Congress reflect declining status and global influence
Kenneth Weisbrode
January 2, 2013