As governments confront many challenges that are global in scale, leaders find they must cooperate in responding to financial, climate, terrorism and other crises. As a result, a global audience has developed keen interest in how and why nations select their leaders. On one hand, citizens expect sensible and collective action, transparency and fair representation; on the other hand, citizens and leaders fret about compromising security, sovereignty or loss of control. Diplomats and global organizations like the United Nations aim to achieve a balance, even as global communications allow citizens in democracies or authoritarian states to steer attention to issues. Attention to citizen demands and multilateral cooperation contribute to stability.

Endgame for Afghanistan

Iran and other regional neighbors are indispensable for smooth transition in Afghanistan
Sreeram Chaulia
November 17, 2010

The G20: Captive in the Prison of Mercantilism

The G20’s failure to take action on coordinating economic policies risks global stability
Ernesto Zedillo
November 13, 2010

US in Asia: Seeking Partners at a Troubled Time – Part II

Obama, more popular in Asia than at home, may find foreign-policy opportunities
Bruce Stokes
November 12, 2010

US in Asia: Seeking Partners at a Troubled Time – Part I

Obama seeks India as strategic partner and career builder
Ashok Malik
November 10, 2010

Obama in India: Taking the Partnership Global

The US and India organize strategy, finding common ground on regional and global issues
Teresita C. Schaffer
November 5, 2010

India's and China's Roads to World Leadership – Part II

Feeling its oats, a brash China may seek revival of historical tributary relationship
Frank Ching
November 3, 2010