As governments confront many challenges that are global in scale, leaders find they must cooperate in responding to financial, climate, terrorism and other crises. As a result, a global audience has developed keen interest in how and why nations select their leaders. On one hand, citizens expect sensible and collective action, transparency and fair representation; on the other hand, citizens and leaders fret about compromising security, sovereignty or loss of control. Diplomats and global organizations like the United Nations aim to achieve a balance, even as global communications allow citizens in democracies or authoritarian states to steer attention to issues. Attention to citizen demands and multilateral cooperation contribute to stability.

Iran’s Global Ambitions – Part III

Global opinion disapproves of Iran’s nuclear weapons program, but differs on how to stop it
Bruce Stokes
September 17, 2010

Iran’s Global Ambitions – Part II

China's caution in supporting UN sanctions is good news for Iran's nuclear aspirations
Willem van Kemenade
September 15, 2010

Iran’s Global Ambitions – Part I

Sanctions don’t slow Iran’s drive for influence in the developing world
Jamsheed K. Choksy
September 13, 2010

A Cash-Strapped US Faces Diminished Political Clout

The US can no longer afford grand foreign-policy initiatives
Michael Mandelbaum
August 31, 2010

Manhattan Project: The Great Mosque Divide

Both conservatives and liberals draw wrong conclusions about a global issue
Sadanand Dhume
August 24, 2010

Power Game in Asia Trips Nuclear Non-Proliferation

Attempts to gain influence by spreading technology threaten the non-proliferation regime
Harsh V. Pant
August 12, 2010

Confusion of the Trump Travel Ban: CNN

Evan Perez, Pamela Brown and Kevin Liptak
January 30, 2017

The Economic Peril of Aggrieved Nationalism

Martin Wolf
January 25, 2017

Argentina Omits Falkland Islands from Map; Online Uproar Swiftly Follows

Longstanding territorial disputes remain controversial
Federico Rivas Molina
January 11, 2017