Appeasement Policy for China: Project Syndicate
India’s buffer with China is shrinking, and India’s leaders should have anticipated China’s incursions in the Ladakh region, suggests Brahma Chellaney for Project Syndicate. China opposed India’s designation of Ladakh as a new federal territory, and labeled its recent moves as defensive. “While India was preoccupied with the COVID-19 crisis, China was apparently planning its next attempt to change the region’s territorial status quo by force,” he writes. China’s military has “established heavily fortified camps in the areas it infiltrated, in addition to deploying weapons on its side of the Line of Actual Control (LAC), within striking distance of Indian deployments.” Chellaney suggests that India’s prime minister appeases China by demolishing local defense fortifications in Ladakh, courting Chinese investment and trade, avoiding official contact with the Dalai Lama and holding summits with China’s president. The goal of such polices was to weaken China’s ties with Pakistan. Chellaney urges less personalization in India’s foreign policy. – YaleGlobal
Appeasement Policy for China: Project Syndicate
A border clash in Ladakh demonstrates the unraveling and futility of India’s appeasement policy with China
Thursday, July 2, 2020
Read the article from Project Syndicate about the border dispute between China and India.
Brahma Chellaney, professor of Strategic Studies at the New Delhi-based Center for Policy Research and Fellow at the Robert Bosch Academy in Berlin, is the author of nine books, including Asian Juggernaut, Water: Asia’s New Battleground, and Water, Peace, and War: Confronting the Global Water Crisis.
Project Syndicate
© Project Syndicate - 2020