Debate abounds over whether globalization is good or bad for the individual, the family, the nation, and the world. Exchanges and interconnections are as old as human history itself, as people moved around the globe in search of opportunity and spreading new ideas. Pessimists view increased interdependence as a terribly destructive trend for communities and culture, while optimists envision a diverse and better life for all. The word “globalization” itself describes an endless range of interactions, both deliberate and accidental. Unforeseen consequences can emerge sometimes decades later. Steady cooperation rather than conflict is in order as global integration continues to influence nearly every aspect of modern life.

Wal-Mart in Global Online Push

Retailers custom-design internet services to target diverse markets
Jonathan Birchall
February 6, 2008

Poor Show at Evian

With conflict at home and the fall-out from the war on Iraq, initiatives to reduce debt in the South and to advance African development slipped off the G-8 summit's agenda.
David Tresilian
June 6, 2003

The Arch of Globalization

What do you make of the US invasion of Iraq? In this installment of his on-going series on Iraq, Abdel-Moneim Said reviews 10 reasons for the Anglo-Saxon war.
Abdel-Moneim
June 5, 2003

Anglosphere: Limits to Globalization

Public health, national security concerns and global terrorism illustrate the barriers to a nation-less global village.
James C. Bennett
May 3, 2003

The Noble Feat of Nike

Globalisation - otherwise known as 'ruthless international capitalism' - is enriching the world's poor.
Johan Norberg
June 13, 2003