Debate abounds over whether globalization is good or bad for the individual, the family, the nation, and the world. Exchanges and interconnections are as old as human history itself, as people moved around the globe in search of opportunity and spreading new ideas. Pessimists view increased interdependence as a terribly destructive trend for communities and culture, while optimists envision a diverse and better life for all. The word “globalization” itself describes an endless range of interactions, both deliberate and accidental. Unforeseen consequences can emerge sometimes decades later. Steady cooperation rather than conflict is in order as global integration continues to influence nearly every aspect of modern life.

The Arch of Globalization

What do you make of the US invasion of Iraq? In this installment of his on-going series on Iraq, Abdel-Moneim Said reviews 10 reasons for the Anglo-Saxon war.
Abdel-Moneim
June 5, 2003

Anglosphere: Limits to Globalization

Public health, national security concerns and global terrorism illustrate the barriers to a nation-less global village.
James C. Bennett
May 3, 2003

The Noble Feat of Nike

Globalisation - otherwise known as 'ruthless international capitalism' - is enriching the world's poor.
Johan Norberg
June 13, 2003

Showdown for a Tool in Human Rights Lawsuits

Accused of aiding Myanmar's military junta, much is at stake for energy giant Unocal, and the future of multinationals.
Alex Markels
June 15, 2003

Modern Globalization

Historical interconnections between communities worldwide have multiplied manifold in recent times
Nayan Chanda
January 5, 2008