As governments confront many challenges that are global in scale, leaders find they must cooperate in responding to financial, climate, terrorism and other crises. As a result, a global audience has developed keen interest in how and why nations select their leaders. On one hand, citizens expect sensible and collective action, transparency and fair representation; on the other hand, citizens and leaders fret about compromising security, sovereignty or loss of control. Diplomats and global organizations like the United Nations aim to achieve a balance, even as global communications allow citizens in democracies or authoritarian states to steer attention to issues. Attention to citizen demands and multilateral cooperation contribute to stability.

The G-20 Must Get Serious

Leaders of the major economies fail to act on reviving the global economy
Gordon Brown, Felipe Gonzalez and Ernesto Zedillo
September 23, 2011

World Needs New Paradigm on Drugs After Failing War

The war on drugs has failed
Santiago Sosa
September 21, 2011

Cycle of “Compulsive Consumerism” Leaves British Family Life in Crisis, Unicef Study Finds

Materialism reinforces inequality, creating difficult and unhappy children
John Bingham
September 20, 2011

Taking It to the Streets

Corruption obstructs India’s role in global leadership
Nayan Chanda
September 14, 2011

How a Palestinian State Could Reward Israel

Not ready for sovereignty, Palestine could walk into a trap
Suhail Khalilieh
September 14, 2011