As governments confront many challenges that are global in scale, leaders find they must cooperate in responding to financial, climate, terrorism and other crises. As a result, a global audience has developed keen interest in how and why nations select their leaders. On one hand, citizens expect sensible and collective action, transparency and fair representation; on the other hand, citizens and leaders fret about compromising security, sovereignty or loss of control. Diplomats and global organizations like the United Nations aim to achieve a balance, even as global communications allow citizens in democracies or authoritarian states to steer attention to issues. Attention to citizen demands and multilateral cooperation contribute to stability.

Preventing a War over Taiwan

With the cross-Strait conflict simmering, delicate US diplomacy may be necessary to cool both sides
Kenneth Lieberthal
February 24, 2005

A World Without the UN?

Without reform in the UN, a descent into “anarchy, terror and war”
Ernesto Zedillo
March 14, 2005

European Leaders Grudgingly Accept Appointment

Wolfowitz's nomination for World Bank head comes at an awkward moment in transatlantic relations
Katrin Bennhold
March 17, 2005

Web Petition Stokes Anti-Japan Passions

Millions online sign a Chinese petition opposing Japan's bid for a UN Security Council seat
Hamish McDonald
March 30, 2005

The Spirit of Bandung

Fifty-year anniversary of Asia-Africa conference brings questions about the direction of regional leadership in a new millennium
Josef Purnama Widyatmadja
April 6, 2005