As governments confront many challenges that are global in scale, leaders find they must cooperate in responding to financial, climate, terrorism and other crises. As a result, a global audience has developed keen interest in how and why nations select their leaders. On one hand, citizens expect sensible and collective action, transparency and fair representation; on the other hand, citizens and leaders fret about compromising security, sovereignty or loss of control. Diplomats and global organizations like the United Nations aim to achieve a balance, even as global communications allow citizens in democracies or authoritarian states to steer attention to issues. Attention to citizen demands and multilateral cooperation contribute to stability.

For Now, Putin Struts on the World Stage

Taking advantage of Obama’s ambivalence, Russia becomes key player in Middle East diplomacy
Thomas Graham
September 19, 2013

Why Is Prosperous China So Anxious?

China’s quest for global respect starts at home with good governance and soft power
Orville Schell
September 5, 2013

Winners and Losers After Arab Spring

Surveys in Egypt, Libya and Tunisia show variations in who’s empowered or sidelined
Lindsay J. Benstead, Ellen M. Lust, Dhafer Malouche, Gamal Soltan, Jakob Wichmann
August 27, 2013

China-US Vie for World Approval

Global citizens view China’s rising economic power over the US as inevitable
Bruce Stokes
August 22, 2013

Amid Mideast Turmoil, What Does Russia Want?

For Syria and beyond, Russia emphasizes principle, pragmatism, sovereignty
Thomas Graham
August 20, 2013

Urgent Need to Protect the Internet

Global standards are needed to resist nations’ efforts to control, censor the internet
John Negroponte
August 8, 2013