As governments confront many challenges that are global in scale, leaders find they must cooperate in responding to financial, climate, terrorism and other crises. As a result, a global audience has developed keen interest in how and why nations select their leaders. On one hand, citizens expect sensible and collective action, transparency and fair representation; on the other hand, citizens and leaders fret about compromising security, sovereignty or loss of control. Diplomats and global organizations like the United Nations aim to achieve a balance, even as global communications allow citizens in democracies or authoritarian states to steer attention to issues. Attention to citizen demands and multilateral cooperation contribute to stability.

Libyan Fallout: Does NATO Divide the Atlantic Partners? Part I

Varying contributions of NATO members in war with Libya reveal a glass half empty
Alistair Burnett
May 10, 2011

WTO Doha Round: Do or Die

World leaders must resist the false promise of another delay in the Doha negotiations
Richard Baldwin, Simon Evenett
May 6, 2011

Pakistan’s Not So Sleight of Hand

Overlooking bin Laden in Abbottabad shows either Pakistani complicity or incompetence on terror
Sumit Ganguly
May 4, 2011

Limits of Chinese Power in Southeast Asia

Common economic goals enable trade cooperation, but China’s tough line on territorial disputes worries the region
Evelyn Goh
April 26, 2011

The West Likes Democracy for Some Arabs, But Not Others

Syrians and Bahrainis chafe under minority rule, but their ties to Iran matter most
Dilip Hiro
April 22, 2011

Guide to Reform the Middle East? Try East Asia

In North Africa and East Asia, former enemies can compromise and build new governments
Humphrey Hawksley
April 20, 2011