As governments confront many challenges that are global in scale, leaders find they must cooperate in responding to financial, climate, terrorism and other crises. As a result, a global audience has developed keen interest in how and why nations select their leaders. On one hand, citizens expect sensible and collective action, transparency and fair representation; on the other hand, citizens and leaders fret about compromising security, sovereignty or loss of control. Diplomats and global organizations like the United Nations aim to achieve a balance, even as global communications allow citizens in democracies or authoritarian states to steer attention to issues. Attention to citizen demands and multilateral cooperation contribute to stability.

A Tahrir Square Moment in India

One activist – and an angry middle class – rallied to protest India’s endemic corruption
Sadanand Dhume
April 18, 2011

China’s Foreign-Policy Balancing Act – Part II

Delicate handling and consistent policies can help China regain the trust of neighbors
Shen Dingli
April 15, 2011

China’s Foreign-Policy Balancing Act – Part I

China, claiming an aversion to using force for international conflicts, hedges on Libya
Jonathan Fenby
April 13, 2011

Libya Exposes Fault Lines in the Mediterranean – Part IV

A new world order – depending on the BRICs – is not emerging anytime soon
Harsh V. Pant
April 1, 2011

Libya Exposes Fault Lines in the Mediterranean – Part II

In the volatile Middle East, successful intervention requires respect for Arab public opinion
Shashank Joshi
March 28, 2011

Libya Exposes Fault Lines in the Mediterranean – Part I

As China and India demonstrate military preparedness, Europe dithers
François Godement
March 25, 2011