As governments confront many challenges that are global in scale, leaders find they must cooperate in responding to financial, climate, terrorism and other crises. As a result, a global audience has developed keen interest in how and why nations select their leaders. On one hand, citizens expect sensible and collective action, transparency and fair representation; on the other hand, citizens and leaders fret about compromising security, sovereignty or loss of control. Diplomats and global organizations like the United Nations aim to achieve a balance, even as global communications allow citizens in democracies or authoritarian states to steer attention to issues. Attention to citizen demands and multilateral cooperation contribute to stability.

India and China Take Different Roads to World Leadership – Part I

An old master of globalization, India leads developing nations
Shyam Saran
November 1, 2010

With Talks Stalemated, Demographics Define Israeli-Palestinian Future

Contrasting birth rates between Israelis and Palestinians will influence Middle East politics
Joseph Chamie
October 6, 2010

North Korea’s Succession Poses New Challenges – Part II

Despite its distaste for North Korean policy, China is loath to pressure the intransigent state
Scott Snyder
October 4, 2010

Asia’s Clouded Horizon – Part II

As new threats emerge, Japan should play a bigger role
Yoichi Funabashi
September 29, 2010

Asia’s Clouded Horizon – Part I

While worried about China, ASEAN remains wary of a US role
Marvin Ott
September 27, 2010

Steps Out of the Global Development Crisis

The crisis isn’t over – not without global partnerships on unemployment and environmental sustainability
Jens Martens
September 20, 2010