As governments confront many challenges that are global in scale, leaders find they must cooperate in responding to financial, climate, terrorism and other crises. As a result, a global audience has developed keen interest in how and why nations select their leaders. On one hand, citizens expect sensible and collective action, transparency and fair representation; on the other hand, citizens and leaders fret about compromising security, sovereignty or loss of control. Diplomats and global organizations like the United Nations aim to achieve a balance, even as global communications allow citizens in democracies or authoritarian states to steer attention to issues. Attention to citizen demands and multilateral cooperation contribute to stability.

Cambodians Refuse to Accept Rigged Elections

Informed by global connections, Cambodians resist shoddy governance and elections
Elizabeth Becker
October 15, 2013

US-Japan Defense Accord Upsets Seoul

South Korea fears that US may set up Japan as responsible for regional security
Shim Jae Hoon
October 10, 2013

Lessons From Negotiating With the Taliban

Attempts at US-Taliban talks require persistence, moral guidelines on end goals
Marc Grossman
October 8, 2013

Latin America: Anti-US in Words, Not Deeds

Despite spying allegations, the United States is locked into partnership with its southern neighbors
Luisa Parraguez, Francisco Garcia Gonzalez, Joskua Tadeo
October 1, 2013

The US and Iran in a Tantalizing Dance

Iran’s president must win over West and keep the hardliners at home at bay
Abbas Amanat
September 26, 2013

Bo Xilai Conviction Will Do Little to Curb Corruption

Constitutional reforms, transparency, free speech are musts for China to fight corruption
Zhiwu Chen
September 24, 2013