As governments confront many challenges that are global in scale, leaders find they must cooperate in responding to financial, climate, terrorism and other crises. As a result, a global audience has developed keen interest in how and why nations select their leaders. On one hand, citizens expect sensible and collective action, transparency and fair representation; on the other hand, citizens and leaders fret about compromising security, sovereignty or loss of control. Diplomats and global organizations like the United Nations aim to achieve a balance, even as global communications allow citizens in democracies or authoritarian states to steer attention to issues. Attention to citizen demands and multilateral cooperation contribute to stability.

Middle East Protests: A Salafist Trap

Extremists seek excuses to destabilize governments, upend success of moderate Islamists
Fawaz A. Gerges
September 19, 2012

A Forgotten War in the Himalayas

The US aided India in its 1962 war with China, taking firm stance on disputed border
Jeff M. Smith
September 14, 2012

US Voters Mull the Economy

Next American president’s moves on taxes, debt or trade will sway the global economy
Bruce Stokes
September 6, 2012

Non-Aligned Summit Belies Isolation of Iran

NAM summit draws 120 member states to Iran, but serves notice on Syria
Dilip Hiro
September 4, 2012

East Asia’s Free for All

Territorial disputes with South Korea and China over islets reveal rising nationalism, Japan’s weakness
Frank Ching
August 30, 2012

Can India Revive Nonalignment?

Nonalignment is an impossible dream, even perilous, for states with big aspirations
Ashley J. Tellis
August 28, 2012