As governments confront many challenges that are global in scale, leaders find they must cooperate in responding to financial, climate, terrorism and other crises. As a result, a global audience has developed keen interest in how and why nations select their leaders. On one hand, citizens expect sensible and collective action, transparency and fair representation; on the other hand, citizens and leaders fret about compromising security, sovereignty or loss of control. Diplomats and global organizations like the United Nations aim to achieve a balance, even as global communications allow citizens in democracies or authoritarian states to steer attention to issues. Attention to citizen demands and multilateral cooperation contribute to stability.

Egypt's Islamist Surprise

Morsi, with a moderate stance, could signal a more active Egypt in foreign affairs
Mohamed El Dahshan
August 21, 2012

Pakistan’s Taliban Nightmare

Pakistan, key to Afghan security, seeks political agreement that protects its interests
Zahid Hussain
August 23, 2012

Beijing Unflustered by Cool Ties With Seoul

South Koreans blame their government for deteriorating relations, as China stands pat
Scott W. Harold
August 14, 2012

South China Sea: New Arena of Sino-Indian Rivalry

China ignores India’s exploration, puts Vietnam’s oil block up for global bid
Harsh V. Pant
August 2, 2012

Is Partition a Solution for Syria?

Following footsteps of India and Pakistan, Damascus may find peace in partition
Dilip Hiro
July 31, 2012

Reform Sprouts in North Korea?

Kim Jong Un’s timid glasnost may signal shift in emphasis from military to economic development
John Delury
July 26, 2012