As governments confront many challenges that are global in scale, leaders find they must cooperate in responding to financial, climate, terrorism and other crises. As a result, a global audience has developed keen interest in how and why nations select their leaders. On one hand, citizens expect sensible and collective action, transparency and fair representation; on the other hand, citizens and leaders fret about compromising security, sovereignty or loss of control. Diplomats and global organizations like the United Nations aim to achieve a balance, even as global communications allow citizens in democracies or authoritarian states to steer attention to issues. Attention to citizen demands and multilateral cooperation contribute to stability.

The Court Rules in Pakistan

Pakistan Supreme Court’s dogged efforts to reduce corruption could signal democracy – or chaos
Paula Newberg
June 21, 2012

Could Europe Ruin the World Economy?

The globe may be safe from euro debt crisis, if countries don’t join the downward spiral
David Dapice
June 19, 2012

World Expectations Lowered

Despite US partisan gridlock, many global citizens don’t see much difference in Republicans or Democrats
Bruce Stokes
June 14, 2012

Standoff in the South China Sea

Scarborough Shoal standoff reveals blunt edge of China’s peaceful rise
Carlyle A. Thayer
June 12, 2012

China’s New Flexibility on Foreign Intervention

Seeking global clout, China’s position on sanctity of sovereignty evolves
Johan Lagerkvist
May 29, 2012

Oil and Gas in Islam’s Faultline

To control oil markets and power, Sunnis undercount Shiites – with US and EU help
Jamsheed K. Choksy, Carol E. B. Choksy
May 25, 2012