As governments confront many challenges that are global in scale, leaders find they must cooperate in responding to financial, climate, terrorism and other crises. As a result, a global audience has developed keen interest in how and why nations select their leaders. On one hand, citizens expect sensible and collective action, transparency and fair representation; on the other hand, citizens and leaders fret about compromising security, sovereignty or loss of control. Diplomats and global organizations like the United Nations aim to achieve a balance, even as global communications allow citizens in democracies or authoritarian states to steer attention to issues. Attention to citizen demands and multilateral cooperation contribute to stability.

Can Afghanistan and Pakistan Prop Each Other Up?

As NATO leaves, a last hope is that Afghans and Pakistanis try economic cooperation
Paula Newberg
March 30, 2012

US Foundations Boost Chinese Government, Not NGOs

China’s government-controlled groups get lion’s share of US foundation grants, despite rhetoric supporting NGOs
Anthony J. Spires
March 28, 2012

India Urged Again to Pursue Non-Alignment

The report, though, breaks new ground in proposing asymmetrical policy towards China
Sumit Ganguly
March 26, 2012

Global Power Shift – Part II

Could the US security pivot toward Asia make NATO irrelevant?
Richard Weitz
March 23, 2012

Global Power Shift – Part I

Is the US focus on Asia a first step away from being a global power?
Alistair Burnett
March 21, 2012

Ides of March in Beijing Politics

Purge of Chongqing’s party secretary signals split between China’s reformers and neoconservatives
François Godement
March 19, 2012