As governments confront many challenges that are global in scale, leaders find they must cooperate in responding to financial, climate, terrorism and other crises. As a result, a global audience has developed keen interest in how and why nations select their leaders. On one hand, citizens expect sensible and collective action, transparency and fair representation; on the other hand, citizens and leaders fret about compromising security, sovereignty or loss of control. Diplomats and global organizations like the United Nations aim to achieve a balance, even as global communications allow citizens in democracies or authoritarian states to steer attention to issues. Attention to citizen demands and multilateral cooperation contribute to stability.

The WikiLeaks Ravage – Part II

Inspired by a modern-day Robin Hood, activists battle for transparency and the internet’s soul
Johan Lagerkvist
December 8, 2010

The WikiLeaks Ravage – Part I

Massive leak of classified reports heightens mistrust at a time when candid diplomacy is crucial
Shyam Saran
December 6, 2010

Can China Afford to Confront the World? – Part II

Questioning intentions for the South China Sea, ASEAN manages China’s new assertiveness
Pichamon Yeophantong
November 30, 2010

Can China Afford to Confront the World? – Part I

Riding the wave of economic success, China thinks it can stand up to the US
Jonathan Fenby
November 25, 2010

The World Is Adrift as Nations Skirmish

However powerful, nations can’t protect themselves without protecting the globe
Kishore Mahbubani
November 23, 2010

Diasporas Shape Politics Back Home from Afar

Global communications make transnational engagement from diasporas a growing force
Terrence Lyons, Peter Mandaville
November 19, 2010