As governments confront many challenges that are global in scale, leaders find they must cooperate in responding to financial, climate, terrorism and other crises. As a result, a global audience has developed keen interest in how and why nations select their leaders. On one hand, citizens expect sensible and collective action, transparency and fair representation; on the other hand, citizens and leaders fret about compromising security, sovereignty or loss of control. Diplomats and global organizations like the United Nations aim to achieve a balance, even as global communications allow citizens in democracies or authoritarian states to steer attention to issues. Attention to citizen demands and multilateral cooperation contribute to stability.

Memorandum to Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump

The next US president can rescue global trade and resuscitate the US workforce
From: Jeffrey E. Garten
April 28, 2016

OPEC’s Control Over Global Oil Prices Slips Away

In a competitive oil market with regional rivalries, OPEC members fail to coordinate production levels
Chris Miller
April 26, 2016

Obama's Cautious and Calibrated Approach to an Assertive China

Whether the US-China relationship after Obama continues with confrontation or cooperation may be in Xi’s hands
Robert Sutter
April 19, 2016

China, Russia Seek to Profit as the EU Beacon of Democracy Goes Dim

The EU – divided over debt, entitlements and refugees – confronts authoritarian politics at home and from afar
Humphrey Hawksley
April 5, 2016

Modi’s Middle East Outreach

With visits to Saudi Arabia and UAE, Modi aims to position India globally so as to isolate Pakistan
Harsh V. Pant
March 31, 2016

International Students Find Roles in US Presidential Campaign

US colleges encourage civic engagement, so international students attend rallies, write op-eds and volunteer for presidential candidates
Paul Elish and Susan Froetschel
March 22, 2016