As governments confront many challenges that are global in scale, leaders find they must cooperate in responding to financial, climate, terrorism and other crises. As a result, a global audience has developed keen interest in how and why nations select their leaders. On one hand, citizens expect sensible and collective action, transparency and fair representation; on the other hand, citizens and leaders fret about compromising security, sovereignty or loss of control. Diplomats and global organizations like the United Nations aim to achieve a balance, even as global communications allow citizens in democracies or authoritarian states to steer attention to issues. Attention to citizen demands and multilateral cooperation contribute to stability.

In US, Every Four Years, Much Ado Over China

US presidential candidates rail about China’s unfair trade practices – then backtrack once in power
Edward Gresser
February 15, 2012

For US, Europe’s Debt Woes Are an Ocean Away

US voters and leaders ignore Europe’s economic crisis at their own risk
Bruce Stokes
February 13, 2012

Where Will the Muslim Brotherhood Take Egypt’s Economy?

Egypt’s Islamists scramble to develop economic policy staying within the dictates of religion
Mohamed El Dahshan
February 6, 2012

Hunger Pains Test North Korea’s Dynastic Succession

Stability in North Korea depends on averting famine and ending nuclear-weapons program
Shim Jae Hoon
February 1, 2012

Burma Ready to Play Ball With US

US puts new focus on Burma amid US-Chinese rivalry in Asia and the Pacific
Bertil Lintner
January 20, 2012

Global Implications of China’s Challenges – Part II

The Wukan event reveals the mounting challenges to China’s authoritarian resilience
Borje Ljunggren
January 18, 2012