As governments confront many challenges that are global in scale, leaders find they must cooperate in responding to financial, climate, terrorism and other crises. As a result, a global audience has developed keen interest in how and why nations select their leaders. On one hand, citizens expect sensible and collective action, transparency and fair representation; on the other hand, citizens and leaders fret about compromising security, sovereignty or loss of control. Diplomats and global organizations like the United Nations aim to achieve a balance, even as global communications allow citizens in democracies or authoritarian states to steer attention to issues. Attention to citizen demands and multilateral cooperation contribute to stability.

Iran Frustrated Attempting to Take Charge of Arab Rising

Iran’s ayatollahs, defiant to global powers, expect Sunni Islamists to fall in line
Jamsheed K. Choksy
December 13, 2011

From Brussels to Durban: Debt and Climate Crises Spotlight Free Riders

Collective action flounders on EU’s fast-moving debt crisis and world’s slow-moving climate change
Scott Barrett
December 9, 2011

Burma in the US-China Great Game – Part II

High-profile US diplomacy upstages China, but a peaceful Burma is in the region’s interest
Aung Zaw
December 7, 2011

Burma in the US-China Great Game – Part I

The US nudges Burma’s nationalistic military toward reform and diversified regional ties
David I. Steinberg
December 5, 2011

Can Asia Step Up to 21st Century Leadership?

National power ambitions and regional competition may constrain Asia’s global leadership
Amitav Acharya
December 1, 2011

Toppling of Libyan Dictator Legitimizes R2P Doctrine

International response in Libya and Responsibility to Protect doctrine puts dictators on notice
Bennett Ramberg
November 29, 2011